Thanks again @EqS for the very well thought out and written proposal.
I will happily side with the overall opinion of the community for this proposal. The original fee structure was decided to not lower the stLINK reward rate too much for if there was a large amount of LINK staked during early access, which didn’t turn out to be the case.
I see no issue with increasing the SDL fee to 10% for the community pool, my only hesitation is that changes to fee structures can set bad precedent for those that are just stLINK holders. Since this change is small and the venn diagram between SDL stakers & stLINK holders is pretty much one big circle I don’t have much concern.
As mentioned in TEMP CHECK | Explore avenues for Protocol Owned Liquidity - #2 by Jonny, if both proposals are seen on favourably then I’d argue to bundle them both as a single proposal to change the overall fee structure. If POL is not seen as favourable, then there can be a community Snapshot vote on just this increase alone to which if passes, would go to the council.